Outside Zone wrote:
If anyone else wants to give away a QB I would entertain offers.
Trade Block Update
Players on the Block:
Positions Needed:
Trade Block Update
Players on the Block:
Positions Needed:
Trade Block Update
Players on the Block:
Positions Needed:
Trade Block Update
Players on the Block:
Positions Needed:
Ballbusters 51 wrote:
Untrustworthy not the proper term. I never gave my word or made a promise. In fact in all 80 of my leagues I’ve held up my end of deals EVERY time and even used to do the handshake deals to trade future 1sts. I have a patent on that. Never broke my word once in the many leagues I’m in. Had you and I had discussion and you said you were only trading back if I can guarantee you a player you wanted and I wouldn’t take him, yes. So maybe i manipulated a little publicly but never broke any word or agreemen
Ok, well, at the very least I have to give you credit for going “all in” with the “sell”…but it was completely unnecessary (since I was taking Caleb at 1.01, not Marv) and now it paints you as untrustworthy in your intentions during negotiations. Not that it seems to matter to you, I guess since it’s just a game we play…
Here was my honest plan…I was willing to pass on Caleb if I could get a move up of 1.09 into the Top 5 to take a QB (probably Daniels at 1.02, if you took Caleb at 1.01) and a WR, but since you only offered 1.06 and Marv, Nabers, and Odunze would be gone, I couldn’t do it. I liked Bowers at 1.06 and thought hard about it, but to drop down from Caleb to Daniels and not get the value of one of those Top 3 WRs, it was a no-go. So, glad I still ended up getting Bowers at 1.08 because it essentially worked out as if we made the deal anyway…but man, that was a lot of wasted time going through all that
Ballbusters 51 wrote:
🤝 agreed brother. It’s gonna come back to bite me in the ass if I can’t move up to 1 and grab him cause I don’t want Daniels lol. Is pry trade it for a proven QB if anything but I put in a nice offer to the 1.1 to hopefully grab him and pair him with Herbert. Easily finishes top 10 imo with Allen Rome and Moore to throw too
Ballbusters 51 wrote:Outside Zone wrote:
If anyone else wants to give away a QB I would entertain offers.
I’d like to thank outside zone for motivating me when he sent this slander out that I “gave away” burrow. 1.4, fields and juedy were all pieces to the puzzle that I had the vision for. That vision is now a reality and this team is loaded long term. Your team on the other hand…..
Outside Zone wrote:
If anyone else wants to give away a QB I would entertain offers.
Starting QB A. O'Connell is available. N. Chubb, J, McLaughlin, J. Mingo are my cuts.
Trade Block Update
Players on the Block:
Best pick offers by Friday takes em’
Potential top 10 QB for a couple more years, 2 starting RBs, a high upside WR and 3 top 26 picks for a 1.1 is not a bad trade at all. 1.1 isn't as valuable in SFlex as standard. For a rebuilding team with roster space to give, I like it.
Ballbusters 51 wrote:
Wow what a trade rape full of trash. Bunch of waiver bums and late picks for a potential generational QB. Congrats Bijan.
Trade Block Update
Players on the Block:
late rd picks