Waddle Waddle wrote:
Why would it get reversed? Sometimes that is the price to play poker to get the next elite rb.
(1.9) You Mother Tucker wrote:
It’s a big trade and probably leaning the one side but I don’t think it should be reversed. Ladd and Walker are both very solid young players but Jeanty could be the next elite RB1. If you could have LeVeon bell or maccafery in their entire primes, you would slam that deal because Ladd and Walker are never going to be elite, just RB2 WR2 upsides, same with late 1st and 2nd rounders most likely
BORN I wrote:It’s a late 1st and late 2nds…. Walker has talent but never hit full potential. McConkey looks like he could be a PPR machine. Slightly heavy on paper, but if it helps both teams…
I usually disagree with unbalanced trades, but Ballbusters is a good player and wouldn’t do it if he didn’t think it would help him.
It’s a late 1st and late 2nds…. Walker has talent but never hit full potential. McConkey looks like he could be a PPR machine. Slightly heavy on paper, but if it helps both teams…
I usually disagree with unbalanced trades, but Ballbusters is a good player and wouldn’t do it if he didn’t think it would help him.
Ballbusters 26 wrote:R- The Princess McBride250 (2.12, 3.12) wrote:
If commish reverses that, I would work something similar to that for Bijan if you want. Also have Allgeier.
Bijan + Allgeier + Higgins + Kupp
K Walker + London + McConkey + 1.10
Something like that?
Says it’s a bad trade then asks for same trade to swap London in for Higgins. Comical
R- The Princess McBride250 (2.12, 3.12) wrote:
If commish reverses that, I would work something similar to that for Bijan if you want. Also have Allgeier.
Bijan + Allgeier + Higgins + Kupp
K Walker + London + McConkey + 1.10
Something like that?