Explanation of Standings
- The Chefs / Armchair QB 2 - Tied on Winning Pct
- The Chefs / Armchair QB 2 - Try to break tie with Pts in Games
- The Chefs / Armchair QB 2 - 545.9 PF vs 522.7 PF
- maduprising / Coomb Stainz - Tied on Winning Pct
- maduprising / Coomb Stainz - Try to break tie with Pts in Games
- maduprising / Coomb Stainz - 476 PF vs 443 PF
- Armchair QB 2 / PSYCHO CHIHUAHUAS 2 - Tied on Winning Pct
- Armchair QB 2 / PSYCHO CHIHUAHUAS 2 - Try to break tie with Pts in Games
- Armchair QB 2 / PSYCHO CHIHUAHUAS 2 - 522.7 PF vs 334.25 PF
- Coomb Stainz / JB Dynasty 1 - Tied on Winning Pct
- Coomb Stainz / JB Dynasty 1 - Try to break tie with Pts in Games
- Coomb Stainz / JB Dynasty 1 - 443 PF vs 514.9 PF
- maduprising / JB Dynasty 1 - Tied on Winning Pct
- maduprising / JB Dynasty 1 - Try to break tie with Pts in Games
- maduprising / JB Dynasty 1 - 476 PF vs 514.9 PF
- Coomb Stainz / Tiger Bait Dynasty 5 - Tied on Winning Pct
- Coomb Stainz / Tiger Bait Dynasty 5 - Try to break tie with Pts in Games
- Coomb Stainz / Tiger Bait Dynasty 5 - 443 PF vs 506.75 PF
- JB Dynasty 1 / Tiger Bait Dynasty 5 - Tied on Winning Pct
- JB Dynasty 1 / Tiger Bait Dynasty 5 - Try to break tie with Pts in Games
- JB Dynasty 1 / Tiger Bait Dynasty 5 - 514.9 PF vs 506.75 PF
- maduprising / Tiger Bait Dynasty 5 - Tied on Winning Pct
- maduprising / Tiger Bait Dynasty 5 - Try to break tie with Pts in Games
- maduprising / Tiger Bait Dynasty 5 - 476 PF vs 506.75 PF
- maduprising / Daddy\'s A List Athletes - Tied on Winning Pct
- maduprising / Daddy\'s A List Athletes - Try to break tie with Pts in Games
- maduprising / Daddy\'s A List Athletes - 476 PF vs 416.2 PF
- Coomb Stainz / Daddy\'s A List Athletes - Tied on Winning Pct
- Coomb Stainz / Daddy\'s A List Athletes - Try to break tie with Pts in Games
- Coomb Stainz / Daddy\'s A List Athletes - 443 PF vs 416.2 PF
- Gumbo Posse Dynasty / Racer X - Tied on Winning Pct
- Gumbo Posse Dynasty / Racer X - Try to break tie with Pts in Games
- Gumbo Posse Dynasty / Racer X - 420.6 PF vs 299.1 PF